220 lines
No EOL
8.9 KiB
Markdown
220 lines
No EOL
8.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
tags:
|
|
- project/iso27DIY
|
|
- dev
|
|
- llm
|
|
- agent
|
|
- LLMgenerated
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Create a proactive conversational agent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prompt: ```I want to create a proactive conversational agent. It will read from a database, what information slots it needs to fill. It will engage in a conversation with the user. How can I create this using open source software```
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can build a proactive conversational agent using several open-source components. Here's a comprehensive approach:
|
|
|
|
## Core Architecture
|
|
|
|
**Intent Recognition & NLU**
|
|
|
|
- **Rasa Open Source**: Excellent for intent classification, entity extraction, and dialogue management
|
|
- **Snips NLU**: Lightweight alternative for natural language understanding
|
|
- **SpaCy**: For custom NLP pipelines and named entity recognition
|
|
|
|
**Dialogue Management**
|
|
|
|
- **Rasa Core**: Handles conversation flow and context tracking
|
|
- **Botpress**: Visual dialogue builder with good slot-filling capabilities
|
|
- **DeepPavlov**: Russian-developed framework with strong conversational AI components
|
|
|
|
**Database Integration**
|
|
|
|
- **SQLAlchemy**: Python ORM for database operations
|
|
- **Apache Airflow**: For orchestrating data pipelines and proactive triggers
|
|
- **Redis**: For session management and temporary slot storage
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Strategy
|
|
|
|
**Slot Management System** Create a configuration-driven approach where your database stores:
|
|
|
|
- Required information slots for each conversation type
|
|
- Validation rules for each slot
|
|
- Follow-up questions for missing information
|
|
- Priority ordering for slot collection
|
|
|
|
**Proactive Triggers**
|
|
|
|
- Use cron jobs or Apache Airflow to monitor your database
|
|
- Implement webhook endpoints for real-time triggers
|
|
- Set up event-driven architecture with message queues (Redis/RabbitMQ)
|
|
|
|
**Conversation Flow**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Database Query → Missing Slots Identification →
|
|
Conversation Initiation → Slot Filling → Validation →
|
|
Database Update → Follow-up Actions
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Sample Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. Database trigger identifies incomplete user profiles
|
|
2. Agent initiates conversation via preferred channel (SMS, email, chat)
|
|
3. Uses Rasa to manage multi-turn dialogue for slot filling
|
|
4. Validates collected information against business rules
|
|
5. Updates database and triggers next actions
|
|
|
|
The key is designing your slot configuration schema to be flexible enough to handle different conversation types while maintaining a consistent dialogue management approach. Would you like me to elaborate on any specific component or provide code examples for particular aspects?
|
|
|
|
Prompt: `elaborate on designing the slot configuration schema`
|
|
|
|
Here's a detailed approach to designing a flexible slot configuration schema that can handle various conversation types and business requirements:
|
|
|
|
## Slot Configuration Database Schema
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This ERD shows the complete database schema for the conversational agent's slot configuration system. Here's a breakdown of the key relationships and design decisions:
|
|
|
|
### Core Entity Relationships
|
|
|
|
**conversation_flows** serves as the root entity that defines different conversation types (onboarding, surveys, data collection, etc.)
|
|
|
|
**slot_definitions** contains the individual data points to collect within each flow, with support for:
|
|
|
|
- Priority-based ordering
|
|
- Conditional dependencies between slots
|
|
- Type validation (email, phone, date, etc.)
|
|
|
|
**slot_validations** allows multiple validation rules per slot with custom error messages
|
|
|
|
**slot_questions** enables context-aware question variations for better user experience
|
|
|
|
**conversation_sessions** tracks active conversations with users, storing collected data and session state
|
|
|
|
**slot_collection_attempts** provides detailed audit trail of user interactions for analytics and debugging
|
|
|
|
Let me show you a Python implementation that demonstrates how to work with this schema:
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Key Design Features
|
|
|
|
- **Flexibility**: The JSONB fields allow for complex validation rules and context conditions without schema changes
|
|
- **Scalability**: Session-based architecture supports pause/resume functionality and concurrent conversations
|
|
- **Auditability**: Complete tracking of user inputs, validation attempts, and conversation flow
|
|
- **Configuration-Driven**: Non-technical users can modify flows, questions, and validations through database updates
|
|
|
|
This schema supports sophisticated conversation flows while maintaining clean separation between configuration and runtime data.
|
|
|
|
### Required database population
|
|
Vendor policy as an example
|
|
|
|
### Summary of Required Database Pre-Population
|
|
|
|
Before the ISO 27001 vendor management policy conversation can start, the following must be configured in the database:
|
|
|
|
#### 1. **Conversation Flow Definition**
|
|
|
|
- **Flow name**: `iso27001_vendor_management_policy`
|
|
- **Description**: Clear purpose statement
|
|
- **Active status**: Must be set to `true`
|
|
|
|
#### 2. **Slot Definitions** (20 information slots needed)
|
|
|
|
The system needs to know exactly what information to collect, organized in these categories:
|
|
|
|
**Company Basic Information (4 slots)**
|
|
|
|
- Company name, industry, size, geographic locations
|
|
|
|
**Regulatory Environment (3 slots)**
|
|
|
|
- Regulatory requirements, data protection laws, financial regulations
|
|
|
|
**Current Vendor Landscape (4 slots)**
|
|
|
|
- Critical vendor count, vendor types, cloud services usage, data processing vendors
|
|
|
|
**Risk Management Context (3 slots)**
|
|
|
|
- Risk appetite, business continuity requirements, data classification levels
|
|
|
|
**Organizational Structure (3 slots)**
|
|
|
|
- Procurement process owner, IT security team size, existing vendor governance
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Preferences (3 slots)**
|
|
|
|
- Policy approval authority, implementation timeline, budget constraints
|
|
|
|
#### 3. **Validation Rules**
|
|
|
|
Each slot must have appropriate validation:
|
|
|
|
- **Text fields**: Length limits, character restrictions
|
|
- **Choice fields**: Predefined option lists
|
|
- **Number fields**: Range validations
|
|
- **Boolean fields**: Yes/no validation
|
|
|
|
#### 4. **Question Templates**
|
|
|
|
Multiple question types per slot:
|
|
|
|
- **Initial questions**: First attempt to gather information
|
|
- **Clarification questions**: When more detail is needed
|
|
- **Validation error questions**: When input is invalid
|
|
- **Confirmation questions**: To verify collected information
|
|
|
|
#### 5. **Dependencies**
|
|
|
|
Some slots depend on others:
|
|
|
|
- Financial regulations questions only appear for financial services companies
|
|
- Follow-up questions based on previous answers
|
|
|
|
### Key Design Considerations
|
|
|
|
**Priority Ordering**: Questions are asked in logical sequence (company basics → regulatory context → current state → implementation preferences)
|
|
|
|
**Conditional Logic**: Some questions only appear based on previous answers (e.g., financial regulations only for financial services companies)
|
|
|
|
**Professional Context**: Questions are phrased appropriately for a consultant-client relationship
|
|
|
|
**ISO 27001 Specific**: All information collected directly supports creating a compliant vendor management policy
|
|
|
|
This configuration enables the agent to conduct a structured, professional consultation that gathers all necessary information while maintaining the context of an ISO 27001 implementation project.
|
|
## Key Design Principles
|
|
|
|
**1. Configuration-Driven Approach** The schema separates business logic from code by storing conversation flows, slot definitions, validations, and questions in the database. This allows non-technical users to modify conversation flows without code changes.
|
|
|
|
**2. Hierarchical Dependencies** Slots can depend on other slots with specific values, enabling complex conditional logic (e.g., only ask for phone number if user prefers phone contact).
|
|
|
|
**3. Flexible Validation System** Each slot can have multiple validation rules with custom error messages. The JSONB fields allow for complex validation parameters while maintaining type safety.
|
|
|
|
**4. Context-Aware Questions** Multiple question variants per slot allow for personalized conversation flows based on context or previous answers.
|
|
|
|
**5. Session Management** Robust session tracking allows for conversation pause/resume and handles multi-turn interactions gracefully.
|
|
|
|
## Advanced Features You Can Add
|
|
|
|
**Multi-Language Support**: Add language_code to question tables
|
|
**A/B Testing**: Version your flows and track performance
|
|
**Dynamic Prioritization**: Adjust slot priority based on user behavior
|
|
**Integration Points**: Add webhook configurations for external system integration
|
|
**Conversation Analytics**: Track completion rates, drop-off points, and user satisfaction
|
|
|
|
This schema provides a solid foundation that can scale from simple forms to complex multi-step conversations with conditional logic and personalization.
|
|
|
|
## Technical Stack Recommendation
|
|
|
|
**Backend Framework**: FastAPI or Flask for API endpoints
|
|
**NLU Engine**: Rasa Open Source for robust dialogue management
|
|
**Database**: PostgreSQL with SQLAlchemy ORM
|
|
**Message Queue**: Redis for real-time processing
|
|
**Frontend**: React/Vue.js for any admin interfaces
|
|
|
|
https://mica-labs.github.io
|
|
https://github.com/Mica-labs/MICA/tree/main |