Cleaned up Literature folder
This commit is contained in:
parent
73a6380034
commit
fe5eda4e05
586 changed files with 53911 additions and 2475 deletions
60
AuditGlue/Idea Validation.md
Normal file
60
AuditGlue/Idea Validation.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
|||
# Idea Validation
|
||||
https://www.reddit.com/r/microsaas/comments/1kvxsdb/the_exact_steps_i_took_to_validate_my_idea_before/
|
||||
|
||||
I know what it's like to try to market a product that no one wants, I’ve built two that completely failed. No one wanted them and I wasted months trying to make it work.
|
||||
|
||||
I’ve also built successful products and the key difference was that the successful products solved a real problem. It sounds obvious but it’s easy to forget sometimes.
|
||||
|
||||
The hard part is how you validate that you are solving a real problem so I thought I’d share exactly how I did it:
|
||||
|
||||
**Step one: Start with a problem thesis and talk to users**
|
||||
|
||||
- I was a founder and I had a problem that I suspected other founders had too
|
||||
|
||||
- So I had my problem thesis and the next step was to talk to my would-be users to see if the problem was real and to understand their view of it better
|
||||
|
||||
- I made a post on [r/SaaS](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/) and [r/indiehackers](https://www.reddit.com/r/indiehackers/) asking founders to answer a few questions and in return I would give them feedback on whatever they were building
|
||||
|
||||
- The key part here was offering them something in return for their time. That makes it a lot easier to get answers
|
||||
|
||||
- Here's one of the posts if you’re curious: [https://www.reddit.com/r/indiehackers/comments/1ea1cpd/lets_exchange_feedback/](https://www.reddit.com/r/indiehackers/comments/1ea1cpd/lets_exchange_feedback/)
|
||||
|
||||
- The got me in touch with 8-10 founders who were willing to answer my survey.
|
||||
|
||||
- I asked questions about pain points related to the problem and tried to get an idea if they were willing to adopt the solution I had in mind.
|
||||
|
||||
- The responses were positive so I had the green light to start building a simple first version
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**Step two: Building the MVP**
|
||||
|
||||
- This is the easy part. Who doesn’t love building?
|
||||
|
||||
- The critical thing here was that I tried to understand what the survey responses were telling me and built a bare bones solution addressing the pain points of these people
|
||||
|
||||
- I built fast. Around 30 days for the MVP
|
||||
|
||||
- That's it. It was time to market this MVP and see if I can get some users
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**Step three: Marketing and collecting feedback**
|
||||
|
||||
- First I set a clear goal. It wasn’t about getting customers, I just wanted as much feedback as possible so I would need active users. Understanding how to make the product better is so much more valuable at this point
|
||||
|
||||
- I set the goal of getting 20 active users in two weeks
|
||||
|
||||
- Then I asked myself where my users hang out and the answer was X and Reddit
|
||||
|
||||
- Next step was to set daily volume targets. I decided to do 5 posts and 50 replies on X every day and on Reddit I would just write a new post when I had something that had worked well on X
|
||||
|
||||
- So I knew exactly what to do every day and then I just executed that plan. It was easy, because I just had to take action, no questions asked
|
||||
|
||||
- Two weeks later I had hit 100 users
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
That was the validation process I used. From there on, all I had to do was improve the product based on what users were telling me and continue marketing. That has taken me all the way to $7,300/mo and growth just becomes easier with time.
|
||||
|
||||
I hope my journey can inspire some of you to not give up and to follow a solid process for building your product.
|
||||
|
||||
Feel free to ask if you have any questions.
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue