richardk/iso27diy-corp
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Removed duplicate

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Richard Kranendonk 2026-05-18 10:26:56 +02:00
parent d63e8988e9
commit 73a6380034
1 changed files with 0 additions and 16 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
Content Factory/Marketing voor ZZP werk/Posts/s01p04en - Good intentions don't scale.md
View file

@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
`Posted on XX May 2026 19:XX CEST to LinkedIn personal stream`
Good intentions don't scale.
Information security often hinges on that one IT administrator who always asks a control question before committing a change. The power user that .... etc. And that's great — until they leave, change roles, or get overloaded.
You don't need more 'awareness' in your organization. You need a process that keeps working, even when people change, tools change, and regulations change. A process that makes risks visible, assigns ownership, and allows for correction before things go wrong.
This is where a security management framework like ISO 27001 can help. If you want, first strip it of all the extra bagage you don't need — but preserve it's core: risk management, ownership, continuous improvement. Keep documentation at a bare minimum. Let people experience the value it brings, the sense of knowing you've secured the process, see what resilience looks like. You can always build it up to a certifiable ISMS. Or not.
The real question isn't whether the crew around the table is taking security seriously at the moment. It's whether your organization is still taking it seriously six months from now, when today's decisions are forgotten and the people who made them have moved on. That's resilience.
How is continuity arranged in your organization? I'm curious — feel free to send me a message.
— Security as a management responsibility — 3/3
\#managingsecurity \#iso27001