richardk/iso27diy-corp
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Vault restructure

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Richard Kranendonk 2026-04-23 11:51:51 +02:00
parent d45797d121
commit ff77508bd1
1433 changed files with 415450 additions and 1201 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

222
Corpus/🎇 Sparks/Working with Branches in GIT.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
---
title: What are the disadvantages of developing in one massive Git branch
source: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/3500d811-96a4-4163-be84-35a371e439b8
author:
- "[[Perplexity AI]]"
published:
created: 2025-06-10
description: Merge Conflicts and Integration IssuesWith many developers working in a single branch, merge conflicts are more frequent and can become difficult to resolve,...
tags:
- clippings
- git
- dev
- "#type/howto"
---
[reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/git/comments/f9du5a/what_drawbacks_have_you_experienced_on_projects/)
[
What drawbacks have you experienced on projects using Gitflow?
](https://www.reddit.com/r/git/comments/f9du5a/what_drawbacks_have_you_experienced_on_projects/)[Software Engineering Stack Exchange](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/235504/branch-per-feature-what-are-the-actual-benefits-and-risks)
[
Branch per feature: What are the actual benefits (and risks)? \[closed\]
](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/235504/branch-per-feature-what-are-the-actual-benefits-and-risks)[DEV Community](https://dev.to/anortef/why-branching-on-git-is-wrong-1pao)
[
why branching on git is wrong - DEV Community
](https://dev.to/anortef/why-branching-on-git-is-wrong-1pao)[Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63270657/please-point-out-the-disadvantage-of-my-git-flow)
[
Please point out the disadvantage of my git flow - Stack Overflow
](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63270657/please-point-out-the-disadvantage-of-my-git-flow)
## Disadvantages of Developing in One Massive Git Branch
**Merge Conflicts and Integration Issues**
- With many developers working in a single branch, merge conflicts are more frequent and can become difficult to resolve, especially as the codebase grows and changes overlap [6](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/).
- Integration issues may arise when multiple features are developed simultaneously, making it harder to ensure all changes work together smoothly [5](https://barro.github.io/2016/02/a-succesful-git-branching-model-considered-harmful/).
**Lack of Isolation**
- Without feature or topic branches, incomplete or experimental code is exposed to everyone, increasing the risk of breaking the main branch and impacting the entire team [6](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/).
- Bugs and half-finished features can more easily slip into the main codebase, leading to instability and more frequent rollbacks [3](https://dev.to/anortef/why-branching-on-git-is-wrong-1pao) [6](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/).
**Reduced Code Review and Collaboration Quality**
- Working in a single branch can hinder proper code review processes, as changes are not isolated and harder to track or revert individually [7](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5979533/branch-by-feature-advantages-disadvantages).
- Transparency suffers, making it difficult for developers to see what others are working on and coordinate effectively [6](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/).
**Slowed Development and Bottlenecks**
- Only one team or feature can be integrated at a time, potentially slowing down overall development and creating bottlenecks when waiting for others to finish their work before proceeding [5](https://barro.github.io/2016/02/a-succesful-git-branching-model-considered-harmful/).
**Technical Debt and Maintenance Challenges**
- Feature toggles, often used to hide incomplete work in a single branch, can increase code complexity and technical debt, making long-term maintenance harder [3](https://dev.to/anortef/why-branching-on-git-is-wrong-1pao).
- The main branch can become cluttered with unfinished or experimental code, making it harder to maintain a stable production-ready state [6](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/).
**Summary Table**
| Disadvantage | Impact |
| --- | --- |
| Frequent merge conflicts | Harder, slower integration |
| No isolation for new features | Risk of breaking main branch |
| Poor code review process | Lower code quality, harder tracking |
| Reduced transparency | Harder to coordinate work |
| Increased technical debt | More maintenance, unstable codebase |
| Development bottlenecks | Slower progress, teams wait on each other |
In summary, developing in one massive Git branch can lead to instability, more conflicts, reduced collaboration, and slower progress, especially as teams and projects grow [3](https://dev.to/anortef/why-branching-on-git-is-wrong-1pao) [5](https://barro.github.io/2016/02/a-succesful-git-branching-model-considered-harmful/) [6](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/).
How can you use branching to your advantages if you are a solo developer?[softwareengineering.stackexchange](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/364051/what-are-the-advantages-of-using-branching-as-a-solo-developer)
[
What are the advantages of using branching as a solo developer?
](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/364051/what-are-the-advantages-of-using-branching-as-a-solo-developer)[reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/git/comments/ghsweh/does_branching_make_sense_in_a_singledev_project/)
[
Does branching make sense in a single-dev project?: r/git - Reddit
](https://www.reddit.com/r/git/comments/ghsweh/does_branching_make_sense_in_a_singledev_project/)[Flavio Copes](https://flaviocopes.com/benefits-of-using-git-and-github-as-a-solo-dev/)
[
Benefits of using Git (and GitHub) as a solo dev - Flavio Copes
](https://flaviocopes.com/benefits-of-using-git-and-github-as-a-solo-dev/)[DEV Community](https://dev.to/daveskull81/git-workflow-do-you-commit-to-master-on-your-solo-projects-hi4)
[
Git Workflow: Do you commit to master on your solo projects?
](https://dev.to/daveskull81/git-workflow-do-you-commit-to-master-on-your-solo-projects-hi4)
## Advantages of Branching as a Solo Developer
**Experiment Safely**
- Branching lets you try new features or refactor code without risking your main (production) branch. If something goes wrong, you can easily discard the branch without affecting stable code [1](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/364051/what-are-the-advantages-of-using-branching-as-a-solo-developer) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/git/comments/ghsweh/does_branching_make_sense_in_a_singledev_project/) [4](https://dev.to/daveskull81/git-workflow-do-you-commit-to-master-on-your-solo-projects-hi4).
**Parallel Development**
- You can work on multiple features, bug fixes, or experiments at the same time, switching between branches as needed. This is helpful if a feature takes longer or if you need to pause work for a critical fix [1](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/364051/what-are-the-advantages-of-using-branching-as-a-solo-developer) [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/git/comments/ghsweh/does_branching_make_sense_in_a_singledev_project/) [6](https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/16rzgdm/what_is_your_git_workflow_when_working_on_a_solo/).
**Easy Rollback and Recovery**
- If a branch introduces problems, you can simply revert to a previous stable branch or commit, making it easy to recover from mistakes [3](https://flaviocopes.com/benefits-of-using-git-and-github-as-a-solo-dev/) [5](https://caffeinecreations.ca/blog/git-workflow/).
**Organized Workflow**
- Keeping the main branch stable and merging only tested, complete features helps maintain a clean, production-ready codebase [4](https://dev.to/daveskull81/git-workflow-do-you-commit-to-master-on-your-solo-projects-hi4) [10](https://git-scm.com/book/ms/v2/Git-Branching-Branching-Workflows) [11](https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/gitflow-workflow).
**Prepare for Collaboration**
- Using branches now makes it much easier to onboard collaborators in the future, as your workflow will already support code review and parallel work [2](https://www.reddit.com/r/git/comments/ghsweh/does_branching_make_sense_in_a_singledev_project/) [5](https://caffeinecreations.ca/blog/git-workflow/).
**Automation and Deployment**
- You can set up automated tests or deployments to run only on specific branches, reducing the risk of breaking production [3](https://flaviocopes.com/benefits-of-using-git-and-github-as-a-solo-dev/) [4](https://dev.to/daveskull81/git-workflow-do-you-commit-to-master-on-your-solo-projects-hi4) [6](https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/16rzgdm/what_is_your_git_workflow_when_working_on_a_solo/).
## Typical Solo Branching Workflow
- Keep the `main` branch stable and production-ready.
- Create feature branches (e.g., `feature/login`) for new work.
- Merge only completed and tested features into `main`.
- Use branches for experiments, bug fixes, or long-running changes.
Branching is lightweight in Git, so even solo developers benefit from a safer, more organized workflow [9](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/) [10](https://git-scm.com/book/ms/v2/Git-Branching-Branching-Workflows).
How do you branch part of your code?[FAUN — Developer Community 🐾](https://faun.pub/awesome-git-technique-for-partial-merge-7d64a7e62440)
[
Awesome Git technique for partial merge | by Michael Radionov
](https://faun.pub/awesome-git-technique-for-partial-merge-7d64a7e62440)[stackoverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38867553/best-practice-for-partial-git-branches-merge)
[
Best practice for partial git branches merge - Stack Overflow
](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38867553/best-practice-for-partial-git-branches-merge)[Atlassian](https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/feature-branch-workflow)
[
Git Feature Branch Workflow | Atlassian Git Tutorial
](https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/feature-branch-workflow)
To branch part of your code or selectively include changes from one branch to another, you can use Git's **cherry-pick** and partial merge techniques:
- **Cherry-pick specific commits:** You can pick individual commits from one branch and apply them to another using
`git cherry-pick <commit-hash>`. This lets you bring only certain changes without merging the entire branch [1](https://faun.pub/awesome-git-technique-for-partial-merge-7d64a7e62440) [2](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38867553/best-practice-for-partial-git-branches-merge).
- **Cherry-pick a range of commits:** To apply multiple commits at once, use a range syntax like
`git cherry-pick <commitA>..<commitB>`. This applies all commits after `<commitA>` up to `<commitB>` inclusively [1](https://faun.pub/awesome-git-technique-for-partial-merge-7d64a7e62440).
- **Partial merge by merging specific commits:** Instead of merging the whole branch, you can merge up to a certain commit by referencing its SHA, e.g.,
`git merge <commit-hash>`, to include only part of the branch's history [1](https://faun.pub/awesome-git-technique-for-partial-merge-7d64a7e62440).
**Note:** Cherry-picking duplicates commits with new hashes, which can complicate history and future merges, so use it sparingly and mainly for quick fixes or selective updates rather than regular workflow [1](https://faun.pub/awesome-git-technique-for-partial-merge-7d64a7e62440).
In summary, to branch or merge part of your code, use cherry-pick for selective commits or commit ranges, and merge specific commits to control exactly which changes get integrated [1](https://faun.pub/awesome-git-technique-for-partial-merge-7d64a7e62440) [2](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38867553/best-practice-for-partial-git-branches-merge).
Do you usually branche on a file basis, or on a procedure/object basis?[AB Tasty](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/)
[
Git Branching Strategies: GitFlow, Github Flow, Trunk Based...
](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/)[nvie.com](https://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/)
[
A successful Git branching model - nvie.com
](https://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/)[daily.dev](https://daily.dev/blog/git-best-practices-effective-source-control-management)
[
Git Best Practices: Effective Source Control Management - Daily.dev
](https://daily.dev/blog/git-best-practices-effective-source-control-management)[Software Engineering Stack Exchange](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/165725/git-branching-and-tagging-best-practices)
[
Git branching and tagging best practices
](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/165725/git-branching-and-tagging-best-practices)
You generally do **not branch on a file or procedure/object basis** in Git. Instead, branching is done at the **repository level**, meaning a branch is a pointer to a specific commit snapshot of the entire project, not just parts of it like single files or functions [1](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/) [8](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Branches-in-a-Nutshell).
## Why branches are not file- or procedure-based:
- Git branches represent the whole project state at a commit, not individual files or objects [1](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/) [8](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Branches-in-a-Nutshell).
- Branches are lightweight pointers to commits, which capture snapshots of the entire codebase, making partial branching by file or procedure impractical.
- Managing branches by features or tasks (feature branches) is the common practice, focusing on logical units of work rather than individual files or functions [3](https://daily.dev/blog/git-best-practices-effective-source-control-management) [5](https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/feature-branch-workflow).
## Typical branching approach:
- Branches are created per **feature**, **bugfix**, or **release** to isolate work on a cohesive change or task [3](https://daily.dev/blog/git-best-practices-effective-source-control-management) [5](https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/feature-branch-workflow).
- Each branch contains all files related to that feature or fix, allowing full context and integration testing before merging back.
- This approach simplifies code review, testing, and integration compared to trying to branch by small code parts.
## Summary
| Branching Basis | Typical Practice | Reason |
| --- | --- | --- |
| File basis | No | Git branches snapshot entire repo |
| Procedure/object basis | No | Too granular, not supported by Git model |
| Feature/task basis | Yes | Logical units of work, easier to manage |
In short, you branch by feature or task, not by individual files or procedures [1](https://www.abtasty.com/blog/git-branching-strategies/) [3](https://daily.dev/blog/git-best-practices-effective-source-control-management) [5](https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/feature-branch-workflow) [8](https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Branches-in-a-Nutshell).